53 research outputs found

    Error estimation in multitemporal InSAR deformation time series, with application to Lanzarote, Canary Islands

    Get PDF
    Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) is a reliable technique for measuring crustal deformation. However, despite its long application in geophysical problems, its error estimation has been largely overlooked. Currently, the largest problem with InSAR is still the atmospheric propagation errors, which is why multitemporal interferometric techniques have been successfully developed using a series of interferograms. However, none of the standard multitemporal interferometric techniques, namely PS or SB (Persistent Scatterers and Small Baselines, respectively) provide an estimate of their precision. Here, we present a method to compute reliable estimates of the precision of the deformation time series. We implement it for the SB multitemporal interferometric technique (a favorable technique for natural terrains, the most usual target of geophysical applications). We describe the method that uses a properly weighted scheme that allows us to compute estimates for all interferogram pixels, enhanced by a Montecarlo resampling technique that properly propagates the interferogram errors (variance-covariances) into the unknown parameters (estimated errors for the displacements). We apply the multitemporal error estimation method to Lanzarote Island (Canary Islands), where no active magmatic activity has been reported in the last decades. We detect deformation around Timanfaya volcano (lengthening of line-of-sight ∼ subsidence), where the last eruption in 1730–1736 occurred. Deformation closely follows the surface temperature anomalies indicating that magma crystallization (cooling and contraction) of the 300-year shallow magmatic body under Timanfaya volcano is still ongoing.Peer reviewe

    Liver tissue HO-1 encoding mRNA.

    No full text
    <p>mRNA expression of HO-1 increased markedly after 3 hours of reperfusion compared to the physiological levels (mean±SD, ***p<0.001 Experimental groups vs. Healthy control, one-way ANOVA, n = 6/group/time point). RIC treatment could further increase HO-1 expression resulting in a significant difference between RIC 1 group vs. Control. (mean±SD, *p<0.05 RIC 1 vs. Control, one-way ANOVA, n = 6/group/time point). Dotted line = physiological values in healthy animals. Abbreviations used: RQ-relative quantification; RIC-remote ischemic conditioning; HO-1-heme oxygenase-1.</p
    corecore